The future of the Paleopedogy Commission
Posted by Edoardo A.C. Costantini 11 Sen 2003 13:44:21
I have read the comments about the disappointing exits of the last INQUA meeting, i.e. the modification of the INQUA structure, which was actually well foreseen, and the proposals of the members of our group. My personal feeling is that we must take the good from the bad. I don't think we should leave INQUA and form another society. I think we should maintain our individuality as a group and the best possible links with INQUA and IUSS. Inside IUSS we maybe have more opportunities, but all has to be verified. We can as well form a sub commission inside INQUA and a commission inside IUSS. To be a group and have an international prominent state the most important thing is to work together and produce good scientific stuff: projects, collaborations, conferences, business meetings, excursions. I hope the different activities of the members of the group will be shared on our web site and many of us will come to our next meeting of Florence. Another issue is proposing new ideas, new scientific challenges, new projects. Some good ones are the topics of our next meetings: "Paleosols and soil mapping activities" (Florence), "Timing the soil forming processes" (Mexico), another one could be "Paleosols as part of our cultural heritage". (By the way: speaking with Sergey Sedov I understood the next meeting in Mexico would have been a joint meeting with the Paleopedology group, did I wrong?). At the moment I don't have any ideas about the funding for the printed version of our newsletter, but I wonder: we do need it really? Looking forward to your suggestions Edoardo A.C. Costantini Istituto Sperimentale per lo Studio e la Difesa del Suolo Piazza M. D'Azeglio 30 50121 Firenze Italy www.soilmaps.it www.issds.it/cncp tel. 0039-055-24912 22 or 33/21/39 fax. 0039-055-241485 e-mail costantini@issds.it
|