ISSUES IN PEDOSTRATIGRAPHY - SUPPORT FOR GEOSOL
Posted by Roger Morrison 15 Jun 1999 14:43:33
June 6 1999 ROGER B. MORRISON, Ph D Former senior research geologist (retired), U. S. Geological Survey Chair, Working Group on Pedostratigraphy, Commission on Paleopedology, INQUA 13150 West Ninth Avenue., Golden, Colorado, U.S.A. Voice: 303-233-1997. Fax: 303-233-0495. E-mail: rbmorrison@earthlink.net WELCOME AND PREAMBLE This is my first e-mail on pedostratigraphic issues, directed chiefly (but by no means exclusively) to members of the INQUA Commission on Paleopedology, prior to and anticipating in-depth discussion of topics at the INQUA XV Congress this summer at Durban, South Africa. First, something about my own background in pedostratigraphy. I was fortunate in getting my early experience near the inception of interest in pedostratigraphy by working for the U. S. Geological Survey on the two chief pluvial-lake sequences in the Great Basin of the U.S., those of Lakes Lahontan and Bonneville (Morrison, 1964a, 1965; 1991). Both lakes had huge drainage areas and their terminal basins contain superb, very detailed sedimentary and pedologic-climastratigraphic records. These records are far more detailed and complete than those available from any glacial and alluvial sequences, equivalent in detail and complementing the loess records of eastern Europe and China. I became intrigued with the many paleosols intercalated with the lacustrine, eolian, and alluvial sediments, first for the information they gave on various lake recessions, then for what they can yield on climate and vegetation while they formed. Later my interest in paleosols broadened both geographically and topically. I attended many field excursions focused on soil science and Quaternary geology in the U.S. and Europe, and conferred with soil-scientists and pedostratigraphers such as Hans Jenny, Guy Smith, Pete Birkeland, Julius Fink, John Frye, Karl Brunnacker, Wolfgang Schirmer, Lee Gile, George Kukla, Vojen Lozek, Leon Follmer, and many others. Some of my conclusions after several decades of pedostratigraphic research are: 1. Paleosols commonly are among the best records of metastability episodes in landscape history, when little or no erosion or sediment deposition took place at a given site; conse-quently, paleosols are important parts of the stratigraphic record. 2. As significant elements of the stratigraphic record, paleosols deserve to be classified and treated rigorously as stratigraphic units. This is why I (1964b) coined and defined GEOSOL as the term for the basic pedostratigraphic unit. It was adopted in this sense in the North American Stratigraphic Code (1983). 3. The physical and biologic records indicate that paleosols formed over distinct, com-monly widely separated episodes of time in response to infrequent combinations of climatic factors that induced both land-surface stability (minimal erosion and deposition) and a more accelerated rate of bio-physiochemical weathering than before, lasting long enough to develop a distinct soil profile. Higher-than-before temperature increases appear to be associated with the intermittent stronger soil-forming episodes, not just precipitation increases. This is why paleosols throught the world correlate nicely with Quaternary interglacials and interstadials-and therefore can be used as stratigraphic datums.. This brings us to the question of THRESHOLDS in temperature-precipitation conditions that, if crossed, trigger certain kinds of soil-profile development. This subject remains nearly unexplored. What were the climatic, time, and other thresholds that induce a Frost Gley versus a Podzol/Spodosol, a Parabraunerde/Udalf, a Haplargid, an Argiustoll, or a Udult? Our knowledge about the past climatic episodes that produced such different soils remains primitive. OUR GOAL SHOULD BE TO GET A PEDOSTRATIGRAPHIC CLASSIFICATION INCLUDED IN THE INTERNATIONAL STRATIGRAPHIC GUIDE A pedostratigraphic classification is not yet included in the International Stratigraphic Guide, which follows the 1983 North American Stratigraphic Code in many other respects. The International Stratigraphic Guide (1994, p. 2) states: "Soils and soil-strati-graphic units have not been covered in this second edition of the Guide. The stratigraphic treatment of soils needs additional consideration before attempting to formalize principles and procedures and to incorporate soil-stratigraphic units into the Guide. These units may be the subject of future discussion by the ISSC." The INQUA Paleopedology Commission should begin formal in-depth discussions with key members of the INQUA's Stratigraphic Commision and the International Stratigraphic Commission, with the goal of getting pedostratigraphic units included in the International Stratigraphic Guide. CONCLUSION A pedostratigraphic classification remains (barely) in the current North American Stratigraphic Code, with GEOSOL as its fundamental and sole unit. The term GEOSOL is becoming used widely among U. S. Quaternary geologists and geomorphologists. Some workers, including myself, recognize that improvements should be made in the definition of GEOSOL in the NASC; also, the code should admit subdivisions of a GEOSOL, akin to members of a Formation and the divisions of pedogenic Paketts in the loess sequences of central Europe. Also, provision should be made for recognition of pedologic changes (pedofacies, similar to chronocatenas) within the same pedostratigraphic unit. Despite any perceived imperfections in the definition of GEOSOL (which can be corrected later), I urge all members of the INQUA Paleopedology Commission to join together in supporting the North American Stratigraphic Code in (1) recognizing a pedostratigraphic classification, and (2) adopting GEOSOL as the basic pedostratigraphic unit. As I have explained, the whole status of recognition into a formal stratigraphic code of a pedostratigraphic classification and pedostratigrapic units is very tenuous among the geologic profession, including many notable stratigraphers. Let us not splinter ourselves with arguments such as whether GEOSOL is the best name for the basic pedostratigraphic unit or (until later) how it should be defined pedologically in the Code. Only after considerable difficulty was the pedostratigraphic classification admitted into and retained in the North American Stratigraphic Code and GEOSOL accredited as its basic and sole unit. Let's move on to more important matters, such as getting appropriate subdivisions of GEOSOLS (pedomembers) and their lateral variants (pedofacies) admitted into the North American Stratigraphic Code---and pedostratigraphic units included in the International Stratigraphic Guide. REFERENCES American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature, 1961, Code of stratigraphic nomenclature: Amer. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 45, P. 645-665. International Subcommission on Stratigraphic Classification, International Union of Geological Sciences, International Commission on Stratigraphy, 1994, International Stratigraphic Guide, a guide to stratigraphic classification, terminology, and procedure, 2d ed.: Boulder, Colorado, Geological Societry of America, 214 p. Morrison, R. B., 1964a, Lake Lahontan, Geology of the southern Carson Desert, Nevada: U.S.Geological Survey Professional Paper 401, 156 p. Morrison, R. B., 1964b, Soil stratigraphy: Principles, applications to differentiation and correlation of Quaternary deposits and landforms, and applications to soil science: University of Nevada, Reno, Ph D Dissertation: Dissertation Abstracts, v. 28, no. 4, 1967. Morrison, R. B., 1965, Lake Bonneville, Quaternary stratigraphy of eastern Jordan Val-ley south of Salt Lake City, Utah: U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 477, 80 p. Morrison, R. B., 1978, Quaternary soil stratigraphy-concepts, methods, and problems, p. 77-108 in Mahaney, R., ed., Quaternary Soils: Norwich, England, GeoAbstracts. Morrison, R. B., 1991, Quaternary stratigraphic, hydrologic, and climatic history of the Great Basin, with emphasis on Lakes Lahontan, Bonneville, and Tecopa , Chapter 10 in Morrison, R.B., ed., Quaternary nonglacial geology; conterminous U. S.: Boulder, Colorado, Geological Society of America, The Geology of North America series, v. K-2, p. 353-371. North American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature, 1983, North American Stratigraphic Code: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bull. v. 67, No. 5 (May), p. 841-875.
|